That same student then admitted that when he looked for
Friendship Evangelism in the Bible he could not find it—so he went ahead and
taught what the Bible said about evangelism.
Was that not an interesting pickle for this Sunday School
teacher to find himself in?
The core of the issue is as follows. The church leader requiring
this student to teach the necessity of friendship prior to sharing the gospel
was, in fact, placing a human friendship in the divine Order of Salvation (aka.
Ordo Salutis). However, when one
studies the Order of Salvation, a long fought over concept for the Protestant
Reformers, nowhere is there included in it the need for human friendship. In
fact, requiring human friendship effectively injects a man-centered addition
into the Ordo Salutis.
The Reformers, for their part, were protesting the
man-centered additions of Catholicism, the Sacraments, priests, the Pope, Mary,
the saints, Holy Water, and other add-ons into the Order of Salvation. Luther’s
focus on Sola Scriptura (Scriptures
alone) made God’s Word the only intermediary between God and the soul of man. It
is through the very words of the Bible that the Holy Spirit works to bring men
to justification and sanctification. The Holy Spirit works in, with, and by the
Word of God. Yes, Jesus is the one and only Mediator between God and man. And
this mediation is explained in, with, and by the gospel proclaimed.
The Christian, through evangelism, becomes a spokesperson
for God by communicating the message of the Scriptures. Nothing should be added
to this message and nothing subtracted from it. The gospel must-needs remain
pure and unadulterated.
However, in recent generations it seems like we have re-injected
a human addition into the salvation process by requiring friendship first.
This man-centered approach was taught by Joseph Aldrich in Life-Style Evangelism in the early
1980s. He used Abraham Maslow’s “Hierarchy of Needs” as the basis for his
approach to evangelism.
“I have used Maslow’s Hierarchy of needs for years as a teaching tool. I find it helpful in determining what level of need a person is struggling to satisfy. Motivation to act appears to be directly related to need. If I can link a solution (the Gospel) to a felt need, I have created a favorable climate to meet that need. … Maslow’s model also lets us see how important genuine Christian fellowship can be as it is specifically targeted to meet these needs.” (pages 90, 94)
So armed with Maslow’s “Hierarchy of Needs” Aldrich came to
the decision that proclamational evangelism was no longer the most useful
methodology:
“Although the proclamational approach to evangelism will have validity until Jesus comes, it is not a means by which the majority of Christians will reach their own private world.” (page 78)
Apparently, the words of Jesus to “This gospel of the
kingdom will be preached unto the whole world as a witness” (Matt 24:14), or “Go
into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature” (Mark 16:15), or “repentance
and remission of sins should be preached in His name to all nations” (Luke
24:47) do not fit the paradigm of Abraham Maslow.
So who wins? Maslow or Jesus? Aldrich or Jesus?
A generation later Steve Sjogren of Conspiracy of Kindness taught people to do “Acts of Kindness,”
borrowing his thinking from a paradigm similar to that of Aldrich. Again a
man-centered approach built on secular psychological foundations. Here is what
Steve Sjogren, Dave Ping, and Doug Pollock wrote in their 2004 book, Irresistible Evangelism:
“Many Christians talk about developing an intimate personal relationship with God, but the message they present to not-yet-Christians focuses almost exclusively on explaining how the atoning death of Jesus satisfies the requirements of God’s justice. … Talking about doctrines such as justification by faith and atonement by the substitutionary death of Jesus is usually unnecessarily confusing.
“…Relationship is the true heart of the matter. … Following Jesus is more than just a handy way to gain admittance into heaven or to avoid hell. It’s more than a magic formula for salvation.” (page 149)
So, according to Sjogren, Ping, and Pollock, talking about
justification by faith is “unnecessarily confusing”! What of the book of
Romans? Consider the great words of Paul in Romans 1:16-17:
“For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ, for it is the power of God to salvation for everyone who believes, for the Jew first and also for the Greek. For in it the righteousness of God is revealed from faith to faith; as it is written, "The just shall live by faith.” (Rom 1:16-17)
Again who wins? The Apostle Paul or Sjogren, Ping, and
Pollock?
This author commends Paul and Jesus. Similarly, Luther’s
concept of Sola Scriptura provides a helpful
foundation for evaluating methodologies of evangelism.
We live in a day of Young, Restless, and Reformed, for
which I am very grateful. In that light, it is quite odd that such a
man-centered approach to evangelism prevails. Ours ought to be a Bible-centered
approach to evangelism. And if our approach to evangelism is truly
Word-centered, then it will automatically be God glorifying and Christ-focused.
For example, there are 52 personal evangelism conversations
in the Gospels and the Book of Acts. The Greek verb “evangelize” is found in
the New Testament 54, 55, or 56 times, depending on which Greek text-type one
is using. There are literally 149 biblical verbs and 20 nouns that explain what
evangelism is. Surely, God has not left Himself without a witness.
In fact, adding a human relationship to the order of
salvation makes our efforts at building a friendship the reason for the
election or predestination of the person with whom we are seeking to build a
friendship. The issue does not become their acceptance or rejection of the
gospel, but rather our efforts in building a relationship. Inversely, our
failure to build a proper friendship then becomes the reason that our
would-be-friend is consigned to hell, not their rejection of the gospel. Therefore,
through Friendship Evangelism, the Enemy lays a guilt-trip on the evangelizing
Christian for the eternal salvation of those he does not properly befriend
before evangelizing. Quite a Catch-22!
The example of Jesus shows that proximity does not
predestine or elect people. In fact, rather the opposite:
“Then He went out from there and came to His own country, and His disciples followed Him. And when the Sabbath had come, He began to teach in the synagogue. And many hearing Him were astonished, saying, ‘Where did this Man get these things? And what wisdom is this which is given to Him, that such mighty works are performed by His hands! Is this not the carpenter, the Son of Mary, and brother of James, Joses, Judas, and Simon? And are not His sisters here with us?’ And they were offended at Him. But Jesus said to them, ‘A prophet is not without honor except in his own country, among his own relatives, and in his own house.’ Now He could do no mighty work there, except that He laid His hands on a few sick people and healed them. And He marveled because of their unbelief. (Mar 6:1-6 NKJ)
In this case the people of Nazareth (1) were astonished at
Jesus and (2) were offended by Him, and (3) Jesus marveled because of their
unbelief. Proximity to Jesus was not helpful. So also with the towns were Jesus
ministered:
“Woe to you, Chorazin! Woe to you, Bethsaida! For if the mighty works which were done in you had been done in Tyre and Sidon, they would have repented long ago, sitting in sackcloth and ashes. But it will be more tolerable for Tyre and Sidon at the judgment than for you. And you, Capernaum, who are exalted to heaven, will be brought down to Hades” (Luke 10:13-15)
In the case of Jesus, Chorazin, Bethsaida, and Capernaum
were the cities were Jesus accomplished much of His ministry. Proximity to
Jesus and experience of His teaching and miracles did not cause them to be more
open to the gospel, but rather it was a cause for Jesus calling for their
judgment!
Yes, nature abhors a vacuum. If we take God out of the
equation, then we put ourselves into it. It is dangerous to build on any
other foundation than that of the Word of God. The following words of Christ make sense
in light of the dangers of competing views of evangelism:
“Therefore whoever hears these sayings of Mine, and does them, I will liken him to a wise man who built his house on the rock: and the rain descended, the floods came, and the winds blew and beat on that house; and it did not fall, for it was founded on the rock. But everyone who hears these sayings of Mine, and does not do them, will be like a foolish man who built his house on the sand: and the rain descended, the floods came, and the winds blew and beat on that house; and it fell. And great was its fall.” (Matt 7:24-27)
